You should never have to sacrifice your brand’s unique personality and style for any vendor-even for a service as important as authentication. Both enterprise and startup customers share this sentiment, and it makes sense. One of the first things I hear on calls with customers is that they don’t want to compromise the way their product looks and feels. Conversion: Stytch offers a wide range of passwordless, frictionless solutions on one platform, with a focus on both security and conversion. Cost: Stytch’s pricing model is completely transparent and decreases as you scale. Ease of integration: Stytch’s docs are easy to read and implement, making for a quick integration process and a painless developer experience. Reliability: Stytch is more reliable, building redundancy and failover logic into every product, so your users can always login. Flexibility: Stytch is more flexible, with solutions that are fully customizable to your brand’s look, feel, flow, and use cases. In this post, I share the top five reasons that come up with customers, and why they choose to convert. So, while this might be the first time you’ve heard of Stytch-a special welcome to those who got here by searching for “Auth0 alternative”-we are seeing more and more companies choose Stytch over rigid Auth0. But age isn’t everything-in fact, it may be holding Auth0 back in many ways (more on that below). Auth0? This makes sense as Auth0 has been around for close to a decade now and Stytch is much newer to the auth space. As a GTM lead at Stytch, one of the most common questions I’m asked by potential customers is: why should we choose Stytch vs.
0 kommentar(er)
